Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Case Against Monarchy The concept that a monarchy is the best form of government would be a fallacy. Al-Farabi and Aquinas' notions about government are incorrect, and are full of irreparable holes. In modern times, the idea of a monarchy has become counter-intuitive and counter-productive. A democratic republic paired with the educated and empowered middle-class is the way to solve the quandary of how to create the ideal government. While the ideas of the Arabic philosophers are intriguing, there ideas about the perfection of monocratic rule are outdated by both new technology and new thoughts Al-Farabi states that, "what's meant by man's presence is that he accomplishes supreme happiness (Bailey 285)." Al-Farabi's fixation is on that of what makes up the ideal "Icelandic town". In his ideal city, 1 supreme ruler who has vast amounts of understanding orders and directs the subordinate classes. Al-Farabi lays out what makes up an idiotic city. He says a terrible society is too fussy on "bare essentials", "wealth", "sensual delights", celebrity, "domination", or "freedom" (Bailey 289). According to Al-Farabi, the ideal society is dominated by someone who can manage the issues of culture or "weeds" (Bailey 289). Al-Farabi claims for a rigorously monocratic government, ruled by someone who can fight temptation. St. Thomas Aquinas believes that, "tyranny is far more likely to grow from rule of the many than that of one person. Hence monarchy is preferable (Aquinas 21)." Aquinas believes that, "dissension among the principles contributes to general dissension." He believes that, "most authorities by the many have entered to tyranny, as is shown in the event of the Roman commonwealth (Aquinas 23)." Aquinas contrasts the king into the captain of the s.. .