Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Supreme Court has stepped up to answer the query if search incident to arrest on cell phones is violating someone right. The lower courts have been split in the choice. The 2 cases which were debated by the Supreme Court is currently Riley vs. California and also Wurie vs. United States. Back in Riley vs. California, it entailed David Riley who was pulled over for having expired tags along with driving with suspended license, that led to impound of his car. Once impounded the San Diego Police plan is to document contents within the vehicle where they found guns. They also discovered a smartphone were they searched it twice without warrants and found pictures of this arrestee posing at the front of vehicle that was recently recognized at a drive by shooting. From that they ran ballistic study on the firearms found in his automobile were they paired gun employed in the drive by shooting. The picture had been used as evidence to prosecute David Riley (Riley, 2009) The California appeal court upheld the conviction. At Wurie vs. United States, Brima Wurie was detained on suspicion of selling narcotics from his automobile; from there authorities took under custody. Where they when through his telephone log when they noticed that the telephone was repeatedly receiving calls. Officers tracked the number to a place different to the address that Wurie had given them. After getting a search warrant they discovered crack cocaine, marijuana, money, and firearms. The 1st U.S Circuit Court of Appeals withdrew evidence discovered in the search stating the internet search incident to arrest exception does not authorize the warrantless search of information on a cell phone seized in an arrestee. Were David Riley and Brima Wurie rights offended? In the moment law enforcement is permitted to search through anything...