Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Self Improvement|
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. at the "The Military's New Hybrid Warriors" suggests that dividing the U.S. Army to two different distinct kinds of units, one for conventional warfare and yet for stabilization operations, would prepare our unit for potential battles. The development of dedicated "Security Cooperation Brigades" are unnecessary and will degrade the U.S. Army's capacity to wage full spectrum operations and defeat future threats. The splitting of the Army isn't essential because of the notion of "Full Spectrum Operations" allowing our apparatus to prepare and train themselves to operate in a lot of kinds of environments. The current manning policies of the U.S. Army cannot manage the production of these units. Historically units ready for only stabilization duties weren't prepared to face traditional forces The U.S. Army knows the challenges we will confront later on. Our Soldiers need to be ready to face a myriad of different types of dangers and challenges later on. Our Soldier can easily go from fighting at a large-scale battle to handing out soccer balls not just in the span of a 20-year livelihood but also in a matter of days based on the situation they find themselves. The U.S. Army's concept of "Full Spectrum Operations" balances the principles of offensive, defensive and stability operations to prepare our descendants to be adaptive to the hazard and environment they're working in. This operational mentality helps create the ability in Soldiers to plan, train for and run missions in numerous environments. This sort of dexterity is that which we expect to see in our future dangers, the idea of this "Hybrid Threat" as summarized in Freedberg's article. The North Vietnamese Army's abilit...