Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Self Improvement|
Justice is often considered in nebulous conditions. Therefore, it's frequently seen through a philosophical lens. Indeed, justice has been examined by prominent philosophers such as John Rawls and Friedrich Hayek. Often regarded as a "soft science," that the concept of justice finds itself the subject of a theoretical frame rather than the scientific study. Despite this theoretical view, much of the concept surrounding justice seeks to determine the causes for any particular type of behaviour. These theories reveal that penological methods work to correct those behaviors. On the other hand, the concept that someone can alter their mind so as to make new behaviors exists inside the scientific biological/psychological realm. By contrast, there are individuals who think that the brain is stagnant for the majority of the individual lifespan. This paper will argue two things. To begin with, emotional connotations associated with justice are synonymous with both neurology and cognitive functioning, thus solidifying the demand for an assessment of justice within a biological context. Second, though justice includes practical applications because of philosophical construct, it needs to be examined through the biological lens of neuroplasticity and the human propensity for modification. Although justice is frequently examined philosophically, the theories behind the collective understanding of justice are mostly psychological. As an example, when examining introductory criminal justice literature, one may discover that behaviorism is discussed. Behaviorism hinges on operant conditioning. Operant conditioning suggests behavior is more likely to happen when it's fortified with reward and not as likely to happen when it is penalized (Fuller, 2010, p. 90). This rationale is consistent with common ret...