Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Self Improvement|
The Impractical Philosophies of Self-reliance and Civil Disobedience The characteristics of Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson would work well in a society comprised only of highly intellectual, healthy people who have been prepared put on the effort needed to completely examine themselves and formulate their own opinions about every topic pertaining to these. Emerson stated that all members of society ought to think for themselves and formulate their own views rather than adapting to some popular belief. Thoreau said that the best government was no government, and that individuals should always do what was merely. A society which served under the ideals of Emerson and Thoreau could have no issues. No money would be needed, as all members of the society could do what was appropriate and help out each other. A farmer would give his grain away and in return would receive everything he needed from other members of society. No crimes would be committed because people would think by what they were about to do and realize that a much better alternative existed. Practically, such a society isn't possible because humans always make mistakes, and since these ideals remaining on the idea that all members of the society will adhere to these, the philosophies aren't sensible. Because humans could never fully stick to them, the philosophies of Emerson and Thoreau will never be embraced in society. The doctrine of Thoreau hinges on the acceptance and precision of this philosophy of Emerson, along with the philosophy of Emerson is destroyed if the philosophy of Thoreau can't be followed. Emerson preached that all men should expect their own hearts, which they believed was good and true. "To believe your own thought, to consider that.