Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Occupy Wall Street's conflicting saying of the disparity between the wealthy and the poor might have begun in good faith by utilizing the Freedom of Speech and General Assembly amendment rights, but the plans a number of these protestors have shown are leading to adverse reactions against themselves. The Occupy Wall Street motion will assuredly cost influenced cities from the double digits of millions of dollars. Increases in sales, overtime, and business expenses will accidentally backfire and increase layoffs. The weight the protestors physically place on a city is weighing down an already financially stressed circumstance. The mass of individuals and their own tent lifestyle has been causing a drain on city financing, and therefore, the money is coming out of allocations for all those branches of the city workforce, for which, the people pay with taxes. Of course, the conglomeration of all protestors is a series of a unguided cast of celebrities role-playing in a chaotic enactment before a culture of varying opinions, beliefs and values. The earnings of the 1 percent elite in 2009 based on adjusted gross income was at 348,000. One wonders how many demonstrating protestors have a family member at the elite 1 percent percent. Some of those self-defeating activities the protestors have brought upon themselves are taunting authorities in spatial boundary invasions leading to forcible removal and police self-protection utilization of pepper-spraying. During a sit-in demonstration at the same school, which seemed to be a set of calm students, a police officer sweepingly sprayed on the sitting pupils. They were repeatedly warned to depart by orders from their chancellor of the school. This can be an act of aggression that is unnecessary and perhaps the simplest thing could have been to predict th...