Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Bartleby, the Villian at Bartleby, the Scrivener Herman Melville's short story, "Bartleby, the Scrivener," poses many moral questions, but neglects to answer these nicely and neatly. Unfortunately, Melville's ambiguities have lead to a unusual interpretations regarding the integrity of the unnamed lawyer who narrates the tale. While it might appear perfectly obvious to most of us that he moves out of his way to be sensitive to Bartleby's needs, beginning with the narrator's enabling him to refrain from certain duties, to refraining from all of his duties, to letting him create his workplace his lodgings, to offering him outside what he owes Bartleby and securing him another position, to even inviting him to live together in the lawyer's own home. Since Harold Schechter puts it, the narrator is supposed "to be a model of terrestrial morality" (359). And, as Donald H. Craver and Patricia R. Plante describe, the absolute most widely accepted modern interpretations of "Bartleby" have based upon the theme of the brotherhood of man or a variation thereof. Throughout Bartleby's passive immunity against all that the methodical law office functions, the unnamed narrator is gradually turned off from his sensible, and secure, and uncommitted place until he stands scorched by the sin which we are, all people, at once interdependent and forlorn (132). Yet still there are critics who assert the attorney doesn't have any set of integrity at all - that what he does is outside of self-interest and can be immoral. One of those critics that feels this way is Thomas Pribek. Pri...