Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
As Walker Percy explores the "dogfish" of perception and understanding in his essay, "The increased loss of the Creature," I question if he realizes how slippery and feisty this issue squirming on his table is. Although whoever has used a guided tour will certainly agree that the original tourist experience is always divorced from that of a discoverer, the wide epistemological statements that Percy extracts out of this scenario appear more difficult than Percy provides them credit, or space, for. When Percy shows that an individual should try to "extract the plain thing from the package," he insists that the average person look for some solid bedrock under the surface of perception (519). In this statement, he implicitly calls the reader to think that such bedrock is and exists accessible to humans, a controversial placement in the postmodern globe. By arguing that excavation towards a static and set "creature" can be done, Percy echoes the tone of voice of Plato, who argues that human beings should make an effort to know the fundamental "forms" lying beneath ephemeral living. Plato and his mentor, Socrates, devised their theory of forms in large component to reconcile a continuously changing physical universe with the criterion of permanence inherent in the Greek description of knowledge, a significant problem for philosophers of that time period, and still today. Put simply, the Greeks, believing that only long lasting and unchanging entities could truly be "known, " needed a method to attain knowledge in light of a constantly changing natural world. With the forms, Plato provided a remedy to this problem, saying that "beneath" the physical world a human perceives there is a dimension of forms, or essences, which persist throughout time, independent of human perception but.