Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Euripides, among Ancient Greece's most renowned playwrights, may be considered as one of the earliest supporters of women's rights. With plays like Alcestis and Medea, he clearly puts a focus on the condition of girls, and also incorporates them at the Chorus of the latter drama, a feat that was not frequently performed in Ancient Greece. During the years, it has been contended that the two central characters in every one of those plays offer conflicting representations of women in these times, and I could safely say that I agree with this argument. I'll enlarge on my view by pointing out an important similarity between Alcestis and Medea, followed with a key gap, and will finish it off by comparing them with the Greek depiction of an "ideal woman." Firstly, even though my thesis states that I support the debate that Alcestis and Medea represent contrasting ideas of a girl, I am not unaware of any similarities. In fact, I've noticed a substantial one, that comes to prove that at the end, they're only human. Here is actually the two women's love for the children. In Alcestis' situation, even though she has consented to accept her husband's location as the person who is supposed to expire, her last thoughts are to get her children. It is clear that she wishes to be assured of her children's well-being when she implores Admetus into "[not] remarry [and to] spare them a stepmother, also poor replacement, full of anger and spite, who would raise her hands against [his] children and [her's]" (Alcestis 324-7). This way, Alcestis would like to be sure that a potential stepmother does not "ruin completely [her] hopes of union (Alcestis 337)" talking about her own daughter, while she has no fear because of her male child because he "gets his father, a fantastic tower of st.. .