Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Plato's Symposium From the Symposium, Plato offers us among the very close-up and individual images of Socrates we have. Socrates himself never wrote a line which we know of; all that we know of him (his own personality, his views, his biography) we all undergo Plato's ey es and pen. We cannot, therefore, know how accurate or embellished this consideration is. The elaborate way Plato presents the "story" of the Symposium can lead you to think that it's a fiction, just as the other works we'll read this term are. It is possible to decide that on your own. The Greek term "symposium" implies something like "drinking party," but additionally, it means something such as "that a convivial [look it up] night of drinking and intellectual conversation." It has been borrowed into English. Look it up in your dictionary. You may translate it "feast." ВЇ Notice that the work begins in medias res. Who's Apollodorus talking to because the work opens? We learn that there was a supper at the house of Agathon, where Socrates had been a guest. Aristodemus (a uninvited guest at that supper) later clarified that day to Phoenix, and to Apollodorus. Phoenix passed on the narrative to "a different individual," who in turn advised Glaucon about the event. Apollodorus then recognized it in detail to Glaucon, and later to some unnamed "companion." It's this previous account that we are reading. Why all this elaborate braid of balances? 1 effect is to lend an aura of verisimitude [look it up] into the events - to make it sound like it actually happened. (Note on p. 2 that Socrates later affirmed a number of th e specifics of this story.) Another is possibly to "cover" any objections regarding the details of this account - in fact to call into question th...