Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Back in Truman Capote's famous non-fiction novel, In Cold Blood, there's proof that affirms the injustices of this trial: death punishment. The final outcome of the trail was never to be any different than passing. "Of all the people in all of the planet, the Clutters were the least likely to be killed" (Capote 85). We know the two guys who killed the Clutter family, Perry Smith and Bill Hickock, preplanned the crime with malice and forethought. Although the activities were crul and grusome, does Death Row match what they did in case their pasts, childhood environments and situation, are poor. Capote reveals the impact of youth on the people and should the death penalty is reasonable. Capote gives the killers a voice to clearly show their humanity by providing youth accounts of the own lives. He also questions the justice of is the death penalty honest, and if underlying bad is a product of childhood or society. Is it nurture or nature? Capote provides a glimpse into the minds of the killers and the character nurture concept. The thorough account the killers' childhoods makes the reader sympathize with all the Clutter loved ones Smith and Hickock. Should they book that the death penalty? Can Truman Capote take a stand on the death penalty? By giving the readers a comprehensive accounting of Perry Smith's and Dick Hickock's youth, Capote sets the reader up to get nurture vs. nature debate about the death penalty. The issue then becomes, do the consequences (if any) caused by environment in youth make for a trained killer or some natural born one? Capote uses different voices to tell the narrative, creating an intimacy between the viewers and the murders, both the readers as well as the sufferers, and the rest of the players in this event--townspeople, investigators, friends of the household. This intimacy lead...