Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Rupert Murray's The End of the Line focuses on the devastation of the waters fisheries and the devastating effects it's already begun to have about ecosystems and less wealthy people. The movie opens with a description of the tribulations of Newfoundland. Once possessing waters so populous with cod that one can "walk across their backs from the sport," improved technology and larger fishing vessels began to deplete the fish stocks. Despite placing a moratorium on fishing in 1992, the fisheries had already been drilled to the point of total collapse. Similar procedures are happening around the planet, as just.6 percent of the sea is restricted to fishing vessels. According to the film, much of the ocean's catch has declined by 90 percent; the continuation of present trends in the past continue, stocks will collapse by 2048. The movie may easily be criticized for exaggerating problems at a few points, including claims that the end of sea foods could be realized over 50 years. The End of the Line is interesting in this aspect, however, as it directly claims that it's less concerned with the specific numbers. In response to claims the fishery decrease of 90 percent had been "totally invalid" and was caused in "hurry to receive a huge image," Dalhousie University's Jeffrey Hutchings says that "if the amount is 90, 95, 80, or 70 is irrelevant; focusing on the particulars is not useful." Any number regarding fish stocks is exposed to attack because of the problem of counting fish. While counting the populations in one area is a near-impossible task, fish will also be capable of frequent and large-scale migration. In this respect, it is in the best interest of the movie to use the most eye-catching figures as the amount is going to be deemed random by...