Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
In 2001, a 54-year-old man lay at the hospital waiting to die. After he had a massive heart attack in 1993, his life wasn't the same. He had been forced to quit his job as a nurse to relieve some of the strain in his heart. Through the years, his condition continued to worsen. Chuck Reynolds went to the hospital in April of 2001 for an evaluation, and on June first the cardiologist told him he wasn't stable enough to go home. Reynolds was put on a waiting list to get a heart transplant. He spent the next three weeks of his life in a hospital bed attached to machines while the hospital staff struggled to keep his heart beating long enough to receive the transplant. On September 13, 2001, Chuck Reynolds finally got the transplant that he needed to stay alive. His surgery went well and he got to go home shortly after. His wife was no longer worried about his health, and Reynolds could ride his bicycle again. The surgery that saved this man's life wouldn't have been possible without animal testing and study ("Heart Transplant: A Life Saved Courtesy of Animal Research"). Each of the techniques and drugs used in organ transplant operations were used on creatures. Scientists had to ensure that the procedures would be safe for a human. They knew where to reduce the blood vessels because scientist and physicians used animals in the 1900's to ascertain how and where to make the cuts. The doctors knew to keep the heart chilly to slow it right down to the surgery because evaluations that was performed in animals (Heart Transplant: A Life Saved Courtesy of Animal Research). Without animal testing Chuck Reynolds and hundreds of others could have lost their lives. Though animal testing is frowned upon, it is ethical. Animal testing is required to make sure individuals safety an...