Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Back in Susan Glaspell's "A Jury of Her Peers," Minnie Foster is accused of murdering her husband. This accusation forces Mrs. Peters to choose between the law and her inner feelings. Her husband would be the sheriff of Dickenson County, Iowa. It has always been a small, quiet town where nothing really happens. Mrs. Peters is confronted with an inner battle. On one side, she is married to the law and also about the flip side she understands what Minnie has been through. Her husband used to mentally abuse her to the point where she is currently basically shy from everyone and everything on the planet. Mr. Hale makes the remark, "Although I stated at the exact same time I did not understand as what his wife wanted made much difference to John" (260). The reader feels sympathy for Minnie through the narrative and gets a feeling of justification for her murdering her husband and getting revenge. Mrs. Peters appears to have trouble deciding whether to side with her inner feelings and cover for Minnie or to side with law. Up to this stage she had always believed that murder was murder and there were no exceptions to the law. Mrs. Peters states, "The law has got to punish crime, Mrs. Hale" (278). Now, for the first time in her life, she sees Minnie might have had justification for murdering her husband. Minnie has every right to kill her husband. John Wright put her through enough misery and pain for a lifetime. That is her only way out. John Wright had secluded her from the world in many ways. He does not even let her have a small bird, "No Wright, wouldn't enjoy the bird, a thing that sang. She was able to sing. He murdered that too" (277). They live far out in the country away from everyone and everything. He wouldn't let her leave the hou...