Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
1. Critique the German Army Group G Commander’s attempts to balance the operational elements in attaining assigned goal(s) and safeguarding the German operational COG against the dual risk of the FFI and the anticipated Allied amphibious assault. German Army Group G Commander General Blaskowitz’s failed in his initiatives to balance the operational elements to accomplish his assigned goals and shield the German operational COG. The misuse of space, period and force combined with operational objective failures emphasize the German Army Group G Commander’s mistakes. Of the errors, the German space-push imbalance was the most significant. General Blaskowitz didn't accomplish two of his three major goals, defend Southern France and keep maintaining control of the Southern France LOCs (Carcassonne Gap and Rhone River Valley). While you can argue he do accomplish his third goal, support OB West in Northern France, the entire Northern France procedure eventually failed, so producing a case that he attained success along with his supporting efforts is tough at best. C2 issues and the German inability to go mistakenly resulted in the protection and preservation of Army Group G’s COG, the mobile reserve force. But this security didn't translate into effective usage of the mobile reserve pressure to repel the Allied landings. Nevertheless, given the severe operational constraints that General Blaskowitz was coping with in August 1944 i believe that he did the very best he, or other people, could did under those circumstancesachieve failing. In the standard critique of German attempts to balance operational elements and shield their COG it really is simple to just state they failed. This is often justified through their fa...