Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The idea of Social Darwinism has been a widely accepted concept from the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from either side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in a variety of ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their concept of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, along with liberal Herbert Spencer equally gave arguments on the usefulness of competition involving people on a international scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the notion of continuous competition among members of the same species and highlighted mutual aid. Heinrich von Treitschke's defense of Social Darwinism was a direct outcome of his view on the country and country. He considered that only displaced nations could stand the test of time, '' also contended that countries who did not showcase their power could finally be preyed upon and parish. Treitschke causes this evident when he states, вЂњHistory wears completely manly attributes; it's not for sentimental natures or to get girls. Just brave nations have a secure existence, a long run, a development; feeble and cowardly countries go to the wall, and rightly so.вЂќ (Treitschke, 11). He considered that competition between countries reflected the excellence of their victor. Treitschke proclaimed that there were two chief purposes of the nation, the second is for the state to generate war and is most important for comprehending his defense Social Darwinism. He believed that only through warfare could a terrific state triumph. In his idea, he takes the concept of rivalry between creatures that Darwin contended, and put them on a worldwide scale where countries competed for superiority. Competition between countries was the only way t.. .