Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The conquest of Mexico began when Hernando Cortes first arrived in South America. After he started his very first motion of this conquest, a few folks looked at him as a terrific leader or even a God and others saw him as a simple man. His conquest introduced the Spaniards and Indians happiness and sorrow at precisely the identical time. The differences between the Spaniards and the Indian accounts were immense and varied from writer to author, for a person's deeds may be good and bad. The differences which the reader encounters inside a Spanish point of view will be between Diaz's and Tapia's descriptions of Cortes' leadership and personality. Diaz explains this conquest as becoming more spiritual as they all controlled themselves to God before heading to war. He quotes Cortes as stating "we shall conquer through the sacred cross" (page 105). Diaz was a faithful soldier to Cortes and addresses to him as "our Captain", however he fails to see Cortes as an individual leader. He seems at him as a mortal with weaknesses, "It seems that God gave us soldiers grace and decent counsel to inform Cortes the way to perform all things in the perfect way" (page 109). This shows Diaz's perception that soldiers like himself affected Cortes, over Cortes affected them. On the flip side, Tapia seems to think the opposite and describes Cortes' actions as "he purchased" or "he told." The concept that Cortes was different from any other Spanish soldier is also seen from the natives' panic toward him. The natives were afraid of these strangers (the Spanish), however, they seem to have higher dread of their chief, because the leaders were consistently considered particular. They even compare Cortes to their own Gods "who know all and there is not any use in denying it to him" (page 118). While, Diaz believed that natives' panic was concentrat...