Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The publication, The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions, by Marcus Borg and N.T. Wright is a dialog of sorts between, "The Major Liberal and Conservative Jesus Scholars" since they "Present the Center of the Historical Jesus Debate." In the introduction, the scholars note that the writing and inspiration of this book grew out of friendship. The book is evidence of the public and private conversations between these members and scholars, sharing in Christian faith and practice as they perform these complex problems in hopes of knowing each other better. Both, "acknowledge Jesus of Nazareth as Lord, and [we] regard the no-holds-barred analysis of his actual history as a very important part of what we mean by this" (viii). Under these circumstances, identified in the book are a few purposes of this writing: the desire to change log-jammed disagreements into more profitable possibilities by suggesting different ways issues may be lined up, in addition to opening up a crucial question, how do different visions of Jesus relate to different visions of the Christian life? Agreeing that discussions and conversations about Jesus ought to be open and from the public world, Borg and Wright act on this common aspiration, and reveal a conversation that's both interesting and refreshing, for its inherent purpose of sparking dialogue between other people, Christian and non-Christian equally (ix-x). In this circumstance, the content of the writing is broken down into eight elements with every scholar authoring one short chapter on each of the subjects, alternating the position of the chapters in a point-counterpoint method. Rarely stating an explicit debate with the contrary, the amorous mode of demonstration does an fantastic job in exposing the underlying tensions between the two...