Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Elizabeth Barrett Browning's Poetic Style Elizabeth Barrett Browning's poetry has been the topic of much criticism. Her elusive style prompted many critics to question Barrett's way of writing. In fact, many critics, such as Alethea Hayter, go so far as to suggest that an "honest critique of her job must acknowledge that she often wrote very poor poetry really" (15). Accusations against Barrett's job were often targeted at her trend for her excess development of thoughts, ineffective forced rhymes, and more frequently than some of her familiarities, her tendency to create her own words. Despite being relatively shunned by the world of poetry, Barrett persisted in composing poetry, even though the majority of her writing time only might have been spent on defending her work instead of writing it. John Forster has commented, "She uses all her ideas and feelings for whatever she's doing. The art of knowing what to leave out she's not attained"(19). In defense of her work Barrett writes in a letter to her husband, Robert Browning, "I don't say what I believe (as was said of me by master-critics) however I take every means to say exactly what I think"(19). Hayter recognizes that Barrett's work was certainly not lacking revision, but was the product of continuous reconsideration. She was said to have revised after every print. For Barrett, the main focus of revising would be to iron out metre, locate perfectly fitting words for her traces, and also to generate literature that read with the motion of pure speech. However, Hayter admits that this constant going within her job to find "just the right word" was exactly what weakened Barrett's work and shaped it into rather exhaustive explanations of exactly what she purposed to communicate with her ...