Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Comparing both Models Of To Build a Fire "I am totally convinced that beyond the theme itself, there is no similarity of treatment anything" (544). Jack London, writing in December 1908, was responding to a question in the Richard W. Gilder, editor of Century Magazine. Gilder, with just published "To Build a Fire" in his magazine, was worried when he came across a second version published 6 years earlier. London's justification was that the first storyline was for boys and also the new one was for men; the only similarity being that the motif itself. Through careful analysis of the two stories, in light of the letter into Gilder, and a different letter to Cloudesly Johns, it is clear that though London claims no similarities (aside from the motif), they certainly exist. Prior to the similarities are discussed, it is crucial to look at the obvious differences that London clarifies are from the "therapy" (544). The 1902 version was printed for boys, although the 1908 model was published for guys. London explains that the motif has been "not just very powerful, but was quite accurate" (ibid). It seems that he first published it for boys because of a sort of instructional narrative; educating the youngsters on the dangers of the cold weather. Therefore, after Tom Vincent learns his lesson, he still gets it to camp and does not obtain any severe damage. Later, London was worried that he had given the motif "insufficient therapy" (ibid). Therefore, he managed the motif again, now for guys, adding a puppy for good measure. Because this story was meant for an older audience, topics may be brought up that weren't appropriate to be discussed at the first one: that the guy considered killing the dog and together with his own body for warmth. Furthermore, the many obviou...