Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Assessment of Euripides Euripides has met the conventions of Attic Tragedy till a Specific extent. Although he was frequently criticised for his work, he followed the structure and cycles of the traditional tragedy. However, his stance on the topics and ideas put him aside from the other authors. It is ridiculous to compare Euripides together with the standard writers of Attic tragedy with no comprehending his mindset and the reason for this attitude. Although he was only fifteen years older than Sophocles, he belonged to an entirely different production. Between them lay the chasm of their Sophists moment. The Sophists were professional teachers who implemented new techniques of criticism to all elements of life. Euripides was a child of this moment. It made him a septic along with a critic. It affected his whole attitude in life and made it impossible for him to accept the presuppositions of horrible art as his predecessors had done. In addition to this, there were several ideas which put aside Euripides out of other people. To contemporary viewers, other tragic heroes frequently seem removed from flesh-and-blood women and men. However, Euripides' personalities are always immediately recognisable. He approached tragedy from the point of view of man, and was interested in human beings. Nowadays, Euripides plays are read by a lot more than those written by Aeschylus and Sophocles. His colorful portrayal of human nature has lured readers for countless generations. Among the most notable surviving plays of Euripides from the current day era is Medea. Inside, he portrayed the battle between a moms...