Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Politics of Name Adjustments in India Since independence in 1947, many places in India have transformed their names. A lot of this resulted from the reorganization of the claims on linguistic lines (instead of British colonial divisions). Nevertheless, within the last six years, many main cities and towns have already been renamed with techniques that affect foreigners even more. Among this flood of changes, three stick out. They are the former towns of Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta, which, with Delhi together, are the "mega towns" of India.1 They will be the four most populous towns in India, and all but Madras are among the 15 most populous metropolitan areas in the world. 2 As a complete result, they are essential commercial and transit hubs, and so are popular outside India. Yet almost six years later, most non-Indians still do not know they are now named Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata. Provided the difficulties involved with these noticeable changes, one expects compelling justifications for the noticeable changes. In each case, these changes have already been justified on anti-colonialist grounds officially. However, I'll argue these changes are instead tools for channeling regionalist sentiment in the conflict between your Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the centrist Indian National Congress (INC), and different regional parties. Opponents of the INC proposed each one of these true names, but those proposed by the BJP and its own nationalist allies have already been more divisive. The entire case of Mumbai was the first major switch to happen, and is the most widely known hence. In 1995, the ruling party in the federal government of the state of Maharashtra (which Bombay was capital) announced that Bombay's name will be changed to its Marathi name, Mumbai.3 The informal observer would presume that the name "B...