Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Civil Disobedience and 1984 In Orwell's 1984, the government is all commanding, all manipulative, and understanding. They assert each element of their manhood's own lives and monitor them constantly. Conversely, in the circumstance of Civil Disobedience, the government is a form of direct democracy. People have their right to vote and the right to publicly express their views. The principal part of 1984 resides in constant fear of his government while Thoreau argues with his and indicates various strategies to cause reformation, he has the freedom of expression much unlike Winston. This is a vital point when trying to indicate any of Thoreau's ideas to reform 1984 socialistic authorities. There is also no hope of rebellion out of actual party members, that is 1 case where Thoreau's ideas prevailed. Even Winston admits early on in the book that the government could not be brought down in the inside, "If there is hopeit can be found in the proles." (Orwell, p. 69) The Party couldn't be destroyed from within, because the Thought Police are all strong and all watching. However, the proles are not educated and do not care whatsoever about the Party. The only time that the Party is of attention will be the lottery, but even that's rigged. "Until they become conscious they won't ever rebel." (Orwell, p. 70) Because the proles are finally unaffected, they will never rise up and take good care of the chance to overthrow the Party. Thoreau was right on the ignorant and unaffected not accepting charge or producing shift, and he was correct on the authorities being unable to correct itself, but in the case of wanting those to put his own conscience ahead of the law it's impossible in the world of 1984. "It is hypocritical for a person to comme...