Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Assessing the Display of War at the Oliver and Branagh Film Versions of Henry the Fifth Many films have been made of Shakespeare's drama, "Henry V". Both I am analysing are from Laurence Olivier (1944) and Kenneth Branagh (1988). They are made for very different audiences with various aims. Though they appear very different, in some ways, Branagh's version used several methods of Olivier's. Both productions were performed to convey the director's feelings on war into the audience and were played when warfare had played a part in recent history. Olivier's version is very pro-war in that he glorifies war but in precisely the exact same time it lacks realism so that it wasn't too close to the fact that people had to endure at the time. The movie was produced in 1944 at the center of the Second World War so portraying war quite realistically would cause uproar in society. There's absolutely no sense of death in the film. This disagrees to Branagh's version that was produced following the Vietnam War. Branagh's film is very anti-war in that it portrays war quite realistically. He uses the film to provide the audience an accurate depiction of warfare. The battles in Branagh's version are very vivid and gory whereas Olivier's is comparatively light-hearted. The films were aimed at completely different audiences and also had different purposes altogether. They were set in different eras so the viewer's response could have been different. Olivier's' purpose in dramatising "Henry V" would be to make the English feel great about themselves. Olivier used this movie to form propaganda, creating a huge pageantry in which England overcame tremendous chances to win a.