Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The fall 1986 Tennessee court decision on alleged "secular humanism" in Holt, Rinehart, Winston textbooks illustrates the continuing controversy during that term. The term "secular humanism" is used today to castigate a wide spectrum of our populous. The derision with which the word is used suggests pictures of dreadful, gruesome creatures. In reality, however, the term only includes 2 sorely misunderstood words. In combination they indicate a virus, though independently they're innocuous, if not healthful. "Secular" means having to do on this planet, or that which is temporal as opposed to spiritual. It indicates something which is not specifically pertaining to faith, or what is apart from God, but not always opposed to God. Christians recognize the worth and legitimacy of the area of life. God declared the Creation "good" As a result, we don't shun the bodily half of our being or of the entire world. Consequently, eating and drinking, operate, and for instance, are properly part of becoming in God's world. The Incarnation is a living illustration of God's respect for the "secular." God in Christ, affirms the worth of the world and its inhabitants. This "secular" business of fact the Christian shares with all other creatures, such as human beings that are human. We can say that the "secular" is a neutral arena, which can be used properly or improperly, for good or for ill, to the glory of God or in defiance of God, depending on the personality and aim of the user. It is up to every person to function or not to serve God through these means. As Paul enjoins, "Whatever you do...do it to the glory of God" (I Cor. 10). Actually, the secular/sacred dichotomy is artificial because God states, "Whatever is under the entire heaven is.