Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Her grades fell. She was always tired. She never appeared to have the ability to concentrate at school. Classes she used to be fascinated in became utterly mundane. Friends she had to care became replaceable. She stopped spending time with her family. She sat on the seat at every soccer game rather than becoming the celebrity player her trainers thought she could. This is exactly what addiction to drugs can do to a young person's life. Addiction can eliminate everything that made that young individual joyful. The one thing that matters anymore is your drug, getting high, and getting higher. It is a horrible and tragic thing that destroys so many young lives. Some people think that so as to avoid these scenarios, the ideal solution is random drug testing. However, this isn't a fair solution whatsoever. A lot more students are selling and using drugs as they roam around the campus, however, will never be "caught" with this kind of erratic and illusive procedure. Random student drug testing is not a plausible solution for the drug problem in public schools; it is unreliable and it impacts in the lives of these pupils involved. People who support random drug testing assert that the developing tendency of drug testing a tiny population of pupils in a school is effective in hiding the drug misuse problem, because fewer students will use when there's an apparent consequence (Drug Testing in School Activities 2). They think whether a drug problem is recognized early enough, there's a better opportunity for rehabilitation. This is true, and with this approach, maybe 1 life can be spared (Legal Issues of Dwiggins 2 School Drug Testing 1). Of course it is worth all the problem of medication testing many innocent students if a single drug addict can be identified and helped, but would it not be much better if that same student's drug problem, and hundreds more, might have been averted altogether? (Student Drug Testing News 1) We can't recognize a drug problem in a significant number of pupils if only a tiny percentage is analyzed; a good drug education program could be more successful. It requires something a lot more earth shattering than the DARE program to steer young people away from experimentation with drugs. Sure, how DARE does a excellent job at teaching kids distinct ways to say no, but do they ever actually understand the reason why they're saying no? Does DARE.