Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Introduction Civil disobedience has always been a debated and polar opinionated topic since the first days that it had been introduced. Whenever it comes to going against a law that is set in stone like something to abide by in a society, then some contentious actions will follow. Whoever played the role as a bit of a backbone within this movement was Henry Thoreau. Back in 1849, when Henry Thoreau re-iterated that the notion of civil disobedience to the people of American following the Mexican war, it was seen by some as exceptionally controversial, some viewed it as treason, then there were the followers which were entirely accepting of it and felt it needed. This is the reason, once the idea came of mixing this idea of civil disobedience that was controversial, with the captivity and whether it ought to be used against the fugitive slave act, was a true catalyst for uproar and praise. The uproar certainly came from some people with high positions in the United States. Two advocates for the compromise of 1850 and the fugitive slave laws were two candidates for president of the United States, Franklin Pierce from the democratic party and Winfield Scott. Even though Franklin Pierce, the ultimate winner of this election, was not as candid regarding his beliefs regarding slavery, he was definitely opposed to civil disobedience from the fugitive slave laws. These supporters generally included northern democrats and southern Whigs. The resistance to the compromise of 1850 and the fugitive slave act consisted mainly of abolitionists of slavery at that time. The most powerful and effective users of their faith to civilly disobey generally came in the north largely since they had the chance. The fugitive slave act brought citizens liv...