Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Plato and Aristotle possess both documented strong views about the influence and sociable purpose of poetry. Plato, in The Republic, outlines known reasons for his `refusal to admit the imitative sort of poetry'(Plato cited in ed. Adams 1992, p. 31). Plato's mention of `poetry' does not connect with the poetry of modern society, since it was a performance artwork and not designed for silent reflection and reading. Julia Annas (1981, p. 94) believes that Plato's concern `was with popular culture, the lifestyle that surrounds children because they develop up; in a present-day setting up his concern will be with novels, (Television and movies)'; like the 2003 movie Home of Sand and Fog. Plato is concerned that youth within his culture will be influenced by unwholesome concepts contained within poetry quickly. The Poetics is partly Aristotle's response to Plato's argument that poetry is a representation of appearances and is thus misleading and morally suspect. Aristotle judges poetry alone terms, not by attractive to concepts of morality. He seeks never to just defend tragedy as a very important poetic art form, but to also dissect and analyse every area of this art. With this information regarding both Aristotle and Plato, it isn't difficult to see that they might have conflicting ideas concerning whether a movie such as for example House of Sand and Fog has any cultural or artistic merit. Plato can be intolerant of tragedy continuously. This is because of the moral conflict it includes. Tragedy attracts the feelings and destroys the moral fibre of the market. They are affected in a manner that they could sympathise with characters, and are in a position to `find why the protagonists enter into irreconcilable conflict, or damage themselves, without having to be able to decrease the result to a moral min or plus...