Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
From the novel Life of Pi, composed by Yann Martel, the notion of the boundaries between savagery and humankind are tossed around quite a bit. In Pi's own life or death scenario, the notion of savagery becomes somewhat obscured by the desperation to live. There are lots of acts within the narrative that individuals that aren't in Pi's situation would possibly see as being savage. As I read this movie, I find most of Pi's activities as a need to live. Pi creates the character of Richard Parker, who's portrayed as a Bengal tiger, to warrant his events of savagery. It is through the different events in Life of Pi that the concept of savagery can be misconstrued and confused with the necessity to call home. Savagery by definition is the action of being uncivilized. The actions I consider to be savage are those perpetrated by the cook to the first couple of days being around the lifeboat. "However there he was, swinging his arms and also catching flies and eating them greedily. He had been in a holy terror for appetite" (Martel 304). After not being on the boat a full afternoon, the cook has been already displaying signs of uncivilized manner by ingesting insects but there were food rations around the lifeboat. Eating flies whenever there's proper meals to be consumed isn't something that could be considered civilized. His actions aren't done out of the necessity to live because there's food on board the lifeboat. If there was no meals available, the actions of the cook could be understood more as an action to survive your life or death scenario. Not only was the cook air flies like a savage, but he was also cutting up the other people to use as bait for fishing. There's absolutely not any need to already start filleting that the sailor because there are still food rations available to the cook at.