Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
"The Tao-te Ching" by Lao-Tzu and "The Prince" by Machiavelli During history, it can be argued that in the crux of the majority of successful societies has since endured a successful allocation of leadership. Consequently, in their respective functions "The Tao-te Ching" and "The Prince", Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli have had to reach a broader comprehension of this connection. The subject of political leaders and their intricate relationship with society really manifests itself within both texts, however, both Lao-Tzu along with Machiavelli approach this dilemma from almost completely contrary positions. Lao-Tzu appears to concentrate the majority of his focus on allowing problems or situations take their course and allowing great to prevail. On the contrary, Machiavelli advocates the requirement for a powerful pioneer, or prince, to take control of his endeavors, and also the abilities or qualities required to maintain energy, at any price tag. Since these thinkers both create an inquiry to what's essentially the identical dilemma of effective leadership, it becomes almost a natural development to juxtapose both in an effort to better understand what qualities a prosperous leader must possess. In this sense, when we use the rhetorical strategy of compare/contrast as a vehicle to transfer us to a more educated interpretation of Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli's conclusions, it will become evident that Machiavelli's attempt is much more successful because his viability serves its purpose far more efficiently. Though they share some similarities in ideology, such parallels are greatly overshadowed by the theories by which Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli diverge. Their principal distinction lies within their opinion of human nature and it's part in regulating. Lao-Tzu maintains that when we encourage a system of regulating to the least possible extent, then human character should attest a favorable temperance and dictate the direction of society. In fact, Lao-Tzu asserts countless attempts to exemplify his point that when leaders, "Stop attempting to control" (§ 57, 35), even then there isn't any desire (§ 37, 24), he also resides in reality (§ 38, 29), and also "the world will govern itself." (§ 57, 35) Although this is an extremely optimistic and beneficial ideal, the principal issue with Lao-Tzu's entire doctrine is precisely that, it may simply be viewed as a philosophy. Since it seems underneath the section entitled "Government," I.. .