Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
With such a large amount of individuals connected to the Internet, concerns for the safety of audiences have surfaced, especially in the region of adult pornography. Many of the men and women who oppose adult porn have recommended a law requiring Internet filters which limit access to all pornographic material on the Internet. But a law which needs Internet filters for all citizens aren't the best solutions because there's insufficient justification to execute them and that many issues will occur from their implementation. The filtering of mature pornography on the Internet isn't justifiable for a plethora of different factors. First, children can be protected from inadvertently viewing porn through more convenient solutions in relation to a law requiring Internet filters. Second, there's insufficient evidence demonstrating the negative effects of adult porn on the mature population to warrant an online filter that limits all online pornography websites. Thirdly, the very first amendment rights awarded to each citizen would be violated by a law calling for Internet filters. Finally, Internet filters might not only block adult porn websites, but may also block educational and legal websites. To protect children from inadvertently viewing adult pornography on the world wide web, a law which needs Internet filters is not the ideal solution. As the quantities of pornographic sites continue to grow and increase, security is really needed. But this protection could be given through more suitable and less restrictive methods, as opposed to via a law requiring Internet filters. The simplest solution is for parent...