Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
When analyzing the battle of Gettysburg from the leadership perspective I discovered the three components of planning, preparation and communicating in the right equilibrium are essential to success. Nevertheless, in the wrong amounts, they can result in failure. These elements are the basis for strong leadership in any business especially in an instructional setting. Throughout the accounts of the events leading to and during the battle both sides at various times had the advantage in each one of these 3 components. However, during this specific conflict in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania that the Union forces experienced the major balance in each of three. From the beginning of the battle that the Union forces had the advantage. Lee had shifted his strategy of leading a continuous defensive campaign to now carrying the offensive and invading the North. This is regarded as a poor strategy from the light of all his previous successes were based on the opposite strategy and in his land. Gettysburg would be the very first battle fought on Northern soil and perhaps this condition wasn't paid sufficient attention. Prior to the battle, General Robert E. LeeвЂ™s military was undefeated because in substantial part to its powerful leadership. A major part of this was the familiarity of Lee with his Generals, Longstreet and Jackson. General Longstreet, called LeeвЂ™s вЂњold war horseвЂќ was an excellent tactician and communicator in his own right. Shortly before arriving in Gettysburg, General Jackson was killed at Vicksburg. He was a hard charging soldier who had little direction to reach tactical advantage. Both of these men were also control mechanics for LeeвЂ™s fanciful trademarks of his commands to his generals. This is evident from the cases of newly marketed General E.. .