Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Case Against Science Science has become an unreliable epistemological resource for many factors. To begin with, the premises of mathematics are all suspect. Secondly, the scientific procedure exhibits narrow limits to the purchase of worldwide knowledge. Third, the decisions of the scientific community at large are questionable and insufficient. Fourth, the practice of science has generated a particular view about its location in the world of knowing that diminishes the rest of the paths of information, to its detriment. Finally, the custom of science entails a philosophical approach which makes scientism and also "pure science" difficult to differentiate. Thus, science itself, within an epistemological discipline, was discovered to be unworthy of their intense respect given it by the current technology-loving world. 1. The assumptions of science are suspect. Historically and philosophically, empiricism was proven to have clear limits, since many people recognize that reality includes things which can be known through the human senses in addition to things which are not known by them. In fact, the exact foundational assumptions of mathematics are suspect. Markos suggests that "many of those givens we take for granted (most importantly, that the foundation of all genuine knowledge is substance, philosophical, and measurable) are as current as they are unproven" . Additionally, there seem statements that seem to indicate that scientific assumptions should not be challenged. "No one would now think to inquire why the inner angles of a Euclidian triangle amount to exactly 180 degrees. The issue is closed because the solution is necessary ". The solution may be mandatory but maybe isn't true; maybe it's simply a convention for the use of th...