Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Assessing The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen were both composed during world war one. War and death are the themes of both poems nevertheless they're written from different perspectives. Brooke seems to base his poem on myth because general he says that it's good to die for your country whilst fighting at war is awful and that it's every soldier for himself and not for your nation. There are lots of explanations as to why Brooke and Owen have different approaches to war. For instance Brook composed The Soldier at the beginning of the war however Owen wrote it in 1916. Brooks wrote his proposal as somebody who has not been at war and now people believed that the war would not continue for long, however Owen did fight in the war but had been written half way throughout the war. Brooke states that it is better to expire at war when fighting for your country, however Owen states that life is terrible at war especially in the trenches Paragraph 2 In The Soldier Brooke boosts the attractiveness of war and portrays departure thus a natural process. He sees it as a natural process because he believes that notions that fight for their own country and perish in war are honourable and are patriots to their nation. He believes that where an English guy dies while fighting for his country will drop and at which they fall means that, that part of land is English. While Brooke cites nothing of this pain and of departure and the disagreeable manners soldiers die in war, in Dulce et Decorum Est, Owen shows the horrible consequences of war. Owen seems to demonstrate that the misery of war by simply setting the scene effectively that he does this by stating, "In all.