Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Nationalism was a debatable concern in 19th century. It had created in Western European countries and Eastern differently, Central Europe. Western European countries was discovered with Civic Nationalism, and nationalism was seen as an imperialist and financial movement also. In Eastern and Central Europe, however, there have been various kinds of nationalism, like the popular nationalism, that targeted at national liberation and unification. Benedict Anderson includes a theoretical definition of nationalism, which aim at correcting previous definitions of nationalism and create an individual, universal theory of nationalism. Compared to Anderson`s definition, Peter Sugars provides four different definitions of nationalism that targets nationalism in 19th century European countries and tries to demonstrate that this is of nationalism differs in certain times, areas and places. Based on the principal sources in the section, Sugar`s view of nationalism is more persuasive compared to the Anderson`s view of nationalism. He has extensive strategy by his definitions of nationalism; by examining different nationalist movements in various elements of Europe he offers total look at of nationalism in 19th century Europe. Compared to Sugar`s view, Anderson`s description of nationalism is bound and cannot be put on any situation concerning nationalism. As an anthropologist, Anderson pursues a theoretical strategy and keeps a macro level theory of nationalism. Through the use of his grand theory of countries, Anderson defines country and nationalism as imaginary principles that are simply made by the people for his or her own purposes; he believes that definition of nationalism is deficient rather than fully evaluated. He formulates a definition of nationalism.