Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the essence of power and his views of electricity continue to be somewhat in existence now. I'll examine this in this essay, highlighting the following thing. Machiavelli discusses power over the individuals, dictatorial power, and electricity with individuals, shared electricity. Although it's feasible for power with to achieve greater incidence in society, then it will not completely eliminate power over. In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses two different groups of people, both the political elite, such as nobles and other princes, and also the general public. Today in the USA, the very first team, the political elite, includes political leaders, spiritual leaders, industry leaders and the leaders of most strong lobbying teams. The composition of the general public has changed little from Machiavelli's time. Machiavelli concentrates on relations between the wolf and the governmental elite. He claims that vision and dictatorial energy induce most nobles and princes. A priest must behave with dictatorial power in order to maintain his position. Machiavelli supposes that shared power will not be successful with nobles, since "whether men endure affection depends upon themselves, but whether they're afraid will be dependent on what the ruler does" (Machiavelli, p.60-61). Since the nobles are unkind and greedy it could be dangerous or even downright suicidal for a prince to rely on their good will. Equally important, Machiavelli says that a prince, a political pioneer, has different concerns than the general public. To get a prince private actions, which would be considered unsuitable or unvirtuous, could save lives or assist the prince's country. In this way a prince is not immoral, but rather acts using a morality different in character from the general people. Machiavelli gives several examples of this. Miserliness is thought to be a fault. However, a miserly prince "will come to be considered more generous if it is recognized that his revenues are enough to defend himself against enemies which attack him, and to undertake campaigns without imposing special taxes on the people" (p.56). Likewise, starting a war can be considered an immoral action by many. However, a priest should not permit troubles "to develop in order to avoid fighting a war because wars can't truly be avoided, but are merely postponed to the advantage of other people" (p.11). Avoiding warfare may.