Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
What are the similarities between the Child Internet Protection Act (CIPA) and the Neighborhood Children's Internet Protection Act (NCIPA)? Are CIPA and NCIPA necessary to protect our children are all they just acts of censorship? This paper will evaluate the two functions, and explore a few different interpretations of the 1st change; namely Article 13. It Is Going to then go into the Event of the American Library Association challenging the acts vs. the United States in 2003. This paper will demonstrate both sides of the situation and why and how the United States won. There plainly is substance on the internet that is educationally unsuitable and pervasively vulgar (Chmara, 2010). CIPA and NCIPA are two similar acts that were put in to effect on April 20, 2001. They were passed to execute web-monitoring applications for kids. CIPA offers discounts via an E-rate app or LIPA if college libraries utilize the web filters to block certain content. They can apply for the reductions on-line. NCIPA uses the very same filters and has exactly the same idea, but it's employed in public libraries and there are no discounts offered. CIPA applicants may not get the discounts provided by the E-rate application unless they certify that they have an Internet safety policy that includes technology protection measures. The protection measures need to block or filter Internet access to images which are: (a) obscene; (b) child pornography; or (c) harmful to minors (such as computers that are obtained by minors)(Federal Communications Commission, 2001). CIPA and NCIPA don't actually keep a log of all of the sites that are viewed. They do not keep track of any content that is obtained on a computer, instead they just block inappropriate content from being accessible from the first...