Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
International laws are the formal rules of conduct that states acknowledge or contract involving themselves (Lamy, p. 480). The issue, or rather issues, enclosing the enforcement of global law include international law being seen as a Western, potentially even imperial, association by states. Moreover, there is the matter of states simply not agreeing to regulations, therefore not being bound by these laws (Lamy, p. 176). International law is commonly criticized as being too Western; this criticism can be exemplified in taking a look at that the UN's permanent members, which includes a strong Western presence, arguably favoring Western within non-western states. International legislation will likely become more important in the time of globalization against that which might be perceived by the difficulties surrounding its enforcement, as compliance seems to be forced along various lines. Four presuppositions as to the reason why nations often comply with international law include, but are not restricted to, reciprocity, collective action, shaming, and domestic worries (globalization101.org). ◦ Reciprocity is a type of authorities where a country is assured that in breaking another country, that nation will respond by returning exactly the same actions. To put this into perspective, if North Korea was going to neglect to comply with treaties limiting nuclear arms, a country such as the US, or some other state for that matter, is relieved of those rules especially in dealing with North Korea. To put it differently, if North Korea violated a treaty by expanding its nuclear arsenal, the US could potentially violate the same treaty in a defensive manner because of what North Korea proceeds to do with its atomic arms. As Michael Walzer stated , it would a only assassination, or in this instance, a.