Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Recent breakthroughs in the field of genetics and biotechnology have attracted attention to the ethical dilemmas surrounding human enhancement. When these discoveries have many positive factors, like the treatment and prevention of many debilitating diseases and prolonging human life expectancy well beyond its present limitations, there are deep moral implications related to the capacity to command our own character. Michael Sandel's "The Case Against Perfection" examines the ethical and moral issues associated with human augmentation while Nick Bostrom's paper, "In Defense of Posthuman Dignity" contrasts the places which transhumanists and bioconservatists carry on this issue of human enhancement. The author's opinions on the dilemma of human genetic enhancement endure compared to one another although those opinions are all based on very similar themes. The author's perspectives on human enhancement, the impact enhancement has on human nature, and the value of dignity are the primary issues discussed by Sandel and Bostrom and will be the focus of this essay. The author's both have opposing views concerning the adoption of human enhancement. Sandel argues against human enhancement and considers that our genetic alteration is going to result in the reduction of humanities appreciation of natural giftedness. It is his belief that this "push to mastery" will transform how humankind interprets humility, responsibility and solidarity. Sandel claims as humility provides way, our appreciation for our natural talents and skills will be lost. Sandel argues that decreasing humility is going to result in an explosion of personal responsibility, placing the load of achievement on us rather of human nature. Sandel believes that enhancement will result in the loss of h.. .