Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Civil Disobedience History, even as Karl Marx imply, is defined by human anguish. When a man is oppressed, his natural recours is rebellion. Most ost restiance motions of the past integrated violenve. Violence has been a mean to an end for centurys. Even today our lives have been chronicled through violence and human suffering. But a paradox succeeds when revolutionaries utilize violence to free themselves from oppression, as a mean to an end. By replacing violence with violence, then you're only contuining a damaging cycle which can in no way liberate everybody. It oppresses the oppressor and depresses the depressed. Martin Luther King jr. sought to cure this unhealthy cycle by means of a new strategy to rebellion. Not only did he inspire countless resist their individual state, he did so without resorting to violence. Through his pragmatic and moral approach to civil rights reform, Martin Luther turned into a radical revolutionist. King considered that the issue with violence as a means of pursuing freedom is that revolutionaries should often employ means that threaten to subvert it hence is untrue, and as Hanna Arendt states in On Revolution, вЂњViolence has no intrinsic worth, and about the individual scale of comparative values, will always lie beneath the human demands and interests that's serves.вЂќ Albert Camus states вЂњViolence can only be an extreme limitation which combats another kind of violence, for example, for example, in the instance of insurrectionвЂќ Both Arendt and Camus agree with King which Violence, although justifiable in extreme cases, can not be valid. King sought to legitimize the Civil Rights Movement by exhorting and adhering to a doctrine of non-violence seated in morals and human integrity. When we hear the w.. .