Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
In the following essay I will talk about aspects of international relations regarding humanitarian intervention and the way they affect a country's responsibilities in the international arena. I will be drawing parallels to historic examples of intervention and to recent world events. I'll inspect the classical realist notion of non-intervention and sovereignty and yet another more recent line of thought, more adapted to the modern system. What I hope to bring forth in this newspaper is a clearer understanding of the situation and the responsibilities of the actors in current foreign relations in regard to diplomatic intervention and rights. Today the world stands more linked than ever before in human history. Nations form economic empires. Lines of commerce run intertwined. Impact and interests span the globe. Electricity is global. With this brave new world come new responsibilities. No longer, can state sovereignty, force rigid impenetrable boundaries between nations and command only responsibility for their taxpayers. But still federal sovereignty in classical global law is untouchable. Together with the philosophical origins of international relations created with the treaty of Westphalia 1648 (Plant 1995: 190) In accordance with it all sovereign rulers possess absolute authority in their nations and no nation has the right to intervene in the domestic matters of other sovereign states. This idea has been the most building block of contemporary international relations since 1945 and the establishment of the UN. The UN Charter clearly prohibits the use of force in international relations to sabotage the "territorial integrity or political independence of any state "(United Nations 1945: Chapter 1 Article 2.4). This idea is so concrete in i.. .