Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Terrorism and Morality by Haig Khatchadourian At "Terrorism and Morality," Haig Khatchadourian asserts that terrorism is always wrong. In this debate, Khatchadourian says that all kinds of terrorism are incorrect because the outcome lacked those terrorized of the fundamental humanity. To this conclusion, Khatchadourian states that even forms of offenses that are designed to result in a moral great are incorrect because of the methods used to achieve that great. Ahead of Khatchadourian spells out why terrorism isn't right, he defines what terrorism is, what causes terrorism, and also what individuals believe terrorism to imply. With a working definition set up, Khatchadourian analyzes terrorism's role at a just war and reveals that terrorism is never just, even through war. With the assertion that terrorism, even during wartime is unfair, Khatchadourian examines the variations of innocence and non-innocence surrounding the victims of a terrorist attack. The study of innocence and non-innocence is accomplished through review of the main of discrimination along with the principal of proportion and how each relates to the terrorism. From both ethical and philosophical standpoints, Khatchadourian finds that terrorism is unjust and wrong due to the way it circles and punishes the innocent with the guilty, not permitting the victim to properly respond to the charges against them. Last, Khatchadourian looks at how terrorism is always wrong because of the way it denies someone their basic human rights. In evaluation of individual's human rights, Khatchadourian finds that terrorism especially "violates its aims' right to be treated as moral men," because it soothes pain, death and suffering to individuals who aren't deserving (298). Main Idea...