Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Daily journalists face the stereotype of being ruthless, untrustworthy, and down right incorrect. However, what people do not realize is that in the beginning this wasn't true and even in today's society journalists are creating a solid effort to resist that stereotype that all these bad journalists have abandoned. One of the ways that journalists are working to fight back is through denying that the two elements of journalism: journalism's first obligation is to the truth, its first loyalty is to citizens, its essence is a discipline of verification, its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover, so it must function as an independent monitor of power, it must offer a forum for public criticism and compromise, its needs to strive to make the substantial interesting and relevant, it must keep the news comprehensive and proportional, and its practitioners have to be allowed to exercise their personal conscience. These components must be used in relation to any piece of journalism. So, as I look at Suskind's "A Hope in the Unseen" I shall evaluate his usage or lack of usage of these nine elements. Journalism's first obligation is to the reality. This is a simple idea, but there is reported to be much battle over the fact that one person's interpretation of what is true may differ from the other's. Can Suskind provide us the "truth" and how did he come upon this "reality"? In Kovach and Rosensteil's "The Elements of Journalism" they discuss how the current journalists clarify the fact as responses that they find in interviews, speeches, marketing slogans, and crude metaphors. However, finding the truth is far more. They describe how it is a procedure that one develops through their encounters within the area. Suskind is a vet...