Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" and Ursula Le Guin's "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas" have long been regarded as some of the greatest short stories of the twentieth century. They have been compared and contrasted for several years because of the presence of a standard key theme: joy within a community because of a single scapegoat, while it is exactly the same person or another person from time to time. Although we can look at the main thought in the story and just state that both Jackson and Le Guin are consuming us the exact same main message, the authors' approach into the scapegoat believed, the reactions of the fictional populations, and the end that we ought to recognize in each story are rather distinct. These are the aspects I will analyse. To start with, we have to immediately recognize that these are really two unique stories. However similar the key ideas are, we have to take different pieces into consideration. Following a quick overview of both stories, one notion springs to mind quickly: how can the people respond to these atrocities, or do they even respond as a whole? I speak, of course, of the sensation of remorse, or to some extent, responsibility. It is not hard to notice that in the event of the individuals of this unnamed village that clinics that the lottery, guilt is very rare, but not completely nonexistent. Among the instances that we realize that a number of the citizens in the village may have second thoughts about the lottery is a few hours prior to the draw, when Mr. Adams informs Old Man Warner "that over in the north village they're talking of giving up the lottery" (Jackson 3). But, we're immediately slapped in the face by the elderly person, who ensures us that the lottery is the only civil approach to move since it has ever been.