Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Comparing Matthew Arnold's Dover Beach and Gerard Manley Hopkins'God's Grandeur Matthew Arnold's "Dover Beach," and Gerard Manley Hopkins' "God's Grandeur" are similar because both poems compliments the beauty of the natural world and deplore man's role in that world. The style and tone of each poem is rather different, yet. Arnold writes in an easy, flowing style and since the poem grows, reveals a deeply melancholy viewpoint. Hopkins writes in a extremely compressed, somewhat jerky style, using paragraphs hefty with alliteration and metaphors. His tone, though touched with despair and possibly even anger in guy, unlike Arnold's poem, reveals an abiding sense of expectation. Fundamentally, every poet is introducing a very different view of Religion, and therefore of person's ultimate condition. Matthew Arnold begins his poem by simply describing a serene, beautiful spectacle. Dover Beach is lying "fair" in the moonlight. It is high tide and he sees the shore of France and "the seas of England... / / Gleaming and vast, out in the tranquil bay." All seems quiet and lovely. Based on Baum's study on the date and circumstances of the poem, Arnold is probably speaking to his new bride (86) since he states, "Come into the window, sweet is your night-air." But the reader feels a changing of tone and mood. He explains the "line of squirt... / Where the ocean meets" the property as "moon-blanched." Along with the wave, tossing pebbles since it comes, is really a "grating roar" having a "tremulous cadence slow" which "bring[s] / The eternal note of sadness in." This melancholy mood grows deeper as he believes of man's long span of history - "The turbid ebb and flow / of individual misery." In another stanza starting with line twenty-five, Arnold gets to the motive.