Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Muslims were leaders of enlightenment in Europe, but they're certainly not after a method of governance via a popular alternative (Lewis 62). Concepts of freedom and freedom were unfamiliar during these days. Nonetheless, the Muslims at large decided to go against their own teachings of sorting out their own events through inspection and were captured in the net of embracing the principles of this West (Lewis, 57). The reason behind the criticism of Christianity and secularism in Western nations, has frequently been described in some instances to be the effect of the fundamentalist approach of Islam. In actuality, the very word "secular" is foreign to the political language of Islam and is present only in the modern Islamic languages because a phrase that isn't entirely approved (Lewis, 61). The folks of those Muslim communities themselves are not ready to give into the rest of religious and government institutions and this alone is a very clear indicator of why democracy cannot sustain itself in Muslim countries. While Lewis does not completely agree to the compatibility between Islam and democracy, '' he doesn't deny that the possibility either. That is to say that democracy could exist in Muslim nations provided that the style of regulating works towards it instead of against it, which the first Islamic faith and regulation are retained at greater settlement (Lewis, 53). Like every other, Islam is not only a faith; rather is it an whole world within a world. It has its very own style of worship, beliefs and doctrines that make up a exceptional system based upon the Islam of the Qur'an and the hadith. A fascinating thing which Lewis describes is that there is no idea of a citizen or citizenship in languages like Arabic or Turkish. There's no indication or identification...