Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Arts Entertainment|
In the science of Psychology, there have been lots of tests showing that there is no physical stage in life when a topic can obtain pure enlightenment, satisfaction, or total satisfaction of mind and body. This supports the assertion that cash cannot buy happiness. Though this idea is quite popular, is it proven wrong? It appears only natural that happiness should flow from having more cash. Could material possessions really increase the joy of someone? In his essay titled "On Dumpster Diving," Lars Eighner discusses his experience of being homeless and having to resort to living off of other people's unwanted possessions to survive. "Some things are white elephants which consume up the possessor's substance" (Eighner 263). It is true that a individual can not physically go and buy some enjoyment, it has to be obtained. "The Way" a topic would obtain happiness or "pure happiness" is your best unanswered question. If someone were to go out and purchase a lot of objects, jewelry, furniture, cars, would that make them pleased with themselves? Perhaps it would, perhaps not. Among the question of the informative article is addressing is, more than time could all of the items someone purchases, takes, or consumes to allegedly make them "happy," over time if this experiment doesn't work as intended, wouldn't a person over time start to become absorbed and over whelmed by all these things. ." . . But certainly psychological things are longer lived than other stuff things" (264). Although, these statements from Lars Eighner concur that some material possessions would have a individual in a negative manner and therefore owning them it is almost ironic because Eighner dwelt on the streets and it had been almost impossible for him to.