Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
In this position paper I've selected Bloodsworth v. State ~ 76 Md.App. 23, 543 A.2d 382 the event to discuss on whether or not the forensic evidence that was filed for this case ought to have been whether or not. To know whether or not the evidence ought to be whether or not we first have to know what the situation is about. This case started on July 25, 1984, together with the passing of a nine year old girl by the name of Dawn Hamilton. The story plays out as follows: Dawn approached two sons and an adult male that were fishing in a pond in a wooded area near Golden Ring Mall in eastern Baltimore, Maryland. He asked the boys to help her find her cousin, they declined the adult man nonetheless agreed to help her look. This has been the last time anyone saw Hamilton alive. HamiltonвЂ™s body was found to have already been raped, beaten and strangled with a rock. The authorities collected a boot print in the scene along with DNA that was discovered in HamiltonвЂ™s underwear. The police also relied on the witness testimonies and line-ups, which in that case was the photograph array. With all the five eye witness testimonies plus a tip the thought to be suspect was discovered. Kirk Noble Bloodsworth a former U.S. Marine without a prior criminal record had been taken into custody and charged with deliberate first degree murder, sexual assault and rape. Bloodsworth was basically convicted on the eye witness testimonies. The state asked the death penalty. Bloodsworth was sentenced to two consecutive life terms. (BLOODSWORTH v. STATE, 1988) About BloodsworthвЂ™s appeal he argued a few points. First he argued that there was not sufficient proof to tie Bloodsworth to the crime. The courts ruled that the ruling stand alone on the grounds that the opinion evidence was sufficient to get reasonable doubt that the c.. .