Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Arts Entertainment|
After we finished watching the documentary street gangs of Los Angeles two theories were most prevalent in my head for why there had been gang formation in that region. The very first being Travis herschi's "social bonds". Second being Walter miller's "focal concerns". Social bond theory isn't a crime causation theory but a pro social behaviour theory which will help explain deviance. This theory identified four social bonds that encourage adherence to society's values and laws. The four bonds being: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. If there wasn't any weakness in any of these four areas are an indicator for the cause of delinquency. Focal concerns concept is different than many other theories because it isn't the rejection of middle-class worth but the reasons for the behaviour comes directly from the lower-class values themselves. Miller identified six regions where lower-class men give their attention t: trouble, toughness, smartness, excitement, fortune, and freedom. The more that someone would take part in one of those areas for longer respect they'd gain. The main reason that I chose these two theories is based mostly on what the gang members directly stated about their own circumstances and the way the documentarians explained the gangs. Together with the societal bonds concept the first of these four bonds is probably the major cause for why young guys join gangs in the first location. Attachment can take three unique types in this concept; affection to parents, school, and coworkers. When many of the gang members have been asked if they had a family we find that most resided in a broken home. Either the mother or dad is in prison or dead because of gang violence. So a number of these adolescents are needing a parental figure to look up to and idolize. Additionally onc...