Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Arts Entertainment|
On December 10th in 1948, the general meeting adopted a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This declaration, though not legally binding, made "a frequent standard of achievement of many people and most of nationsto promote respect for those rights and rights" (Goodhart, 379). But many cultures assert that the human rights policies outlined in the declaration undermine cultural beliefs and practices. This assertion makes the search for universal human rights rather tricky to attain. I would love to focus on content 3, 14 and 25 to address these posts may be modified to integrate cultural influences, without completely undermining the hunt for human rights practices. Article 3, of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, states "everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person" (Goodhart, 379). This article creates cultural discrepancies that are rooted in distributing undefined and ambiguous vocabulary. For example, there are cultural disputes concerning the definition of a "person". In most monotheistic cultures cyber is regarded as a crime. Advocates of this opinion support that a fetus is a human being from conception. Under these pretenses it's the best of a fetus to live, and some other girls who commits abortion, regardless of the conditions, is in breach of the embryo's individual rights. To eliminate this ethnic disagreement, it is crucial to carefully define the conditions in the report. As an instance, the article may read: "every breathing human has the right to life, liberty and the security of a person". Under those modifications, the definition protects the life of all breathing human; removing the cultural discrepancy of exactly what constitutes a lifetime. In due course, the.